The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals permanently lifted an injunction blocking enforcement of President Trump’s Executive Order targeting DEI practices and initiatives.
Why it matters: The decision allows the administration to move fully forward with its anti-DEI agenda, including requiring federal contractors to certify that their DEI practices do not violate the law, putting more pressure on companies to end their DEI efforts.
The Executive Order and subsequent lawsuits: Trump issued the Executive Order “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” almost immediately after taking office last year.
Injunction fully lifted: In a full decision on the merits last week, the Fourth Circuit echoed its temporary decision from last year and found that the EO was not unlawful on its face, as it in theory only enforces existing anti-discrimination law.
- The court noted that future parties could still challenge the way the EO is enforced in practice moving forward – i.e., a federal contractor could challenge the administration’s certification requirement if it is based on a definition of “illegal DEI” clearly at odds with anti-discrimination law.
- The case could eventually make its way up to the Supreme Court, which is likely to agree with the Fourth Circuit’s decision.
What employers need to know:
- While the administration has already not been shy about targeting employers for allegedly unlawful DEI practices, the decision removes any remaining legal barriers to including certification requirements for federal contractors, as well as ongoing DOJ investigations into private companies.
- The certification requirements create significant risk for contractors, as the administration continues to be vague about what it considers “illegal DEI.”
- EEOC Chair Lucas has stated that the Commission is unlikely to provide specific guidance on “illegal DEI” beyond what was already articulated by the DOJ.
- Companies will continue to face legal and reputational pressure from the administration over DEI initiatives, while being left in the dark about what exactly constitutes “illegal DEI” until enforcement actions are taken.